Popular Pastimes of Victorian Children (List 6)
The Victorian era (1837–1901) was a time of dramatic social and technological change, yet for children it was also an age of simple amusements and earnest play. Victorian children did not have televisions, video games, or smartphones; instead, they found myriad ways to entertain themselves using the materials and imagination at hand. From the grand estates of the wealthy to the humble streets where poor children labored, play took on many forms. Indeed, the era’s recreational activities for youngsters ranged from homemade toys and outdoor games to benign family pastimes and engrossing books. These activities were not mere idle fun – they often reflected the values, challenges, and innovations of Victorian society. In examining the popular pastimes of Victorian children, we can ascertain much about 19th-century childhood: how children of different classes spent their free time, what lessons and values were imparted through play, and how those prevalent amusements helped shape the concept of childhood itself[1][2]. This exploration also reveals the era’s fascinating blend of creativity and restraint – a world in which children’s play could be at once imaginative and instructive, leisurely and purposeful.
Childhood and Society in the Victorian Era
Victorian childhood unfolded under conditions very unlike those of today. It was said that Queen Victoria’s England was a “child-dominated society,” with one in every three subjects under the age of fifteen[1]. Yet the experiences of those children varied enormously by social class. Noteworthy differences separated the lives of wealthy and poor children, shaping their access to leisure. In upper-class families, children were often raised by nannies and governesses and educated at home, with a strict emphasis on proper behavior and academic diligence. Their days were highly structured, leaving limited autonomy for free play except in allotted afternoon hours[3]. Even playtime for the well-off was carefully supervised and infused with lessons: a young aristocrat might play a piano for amusement or practice needlework, activities that were optimistic parents hoped would instill refinement and skill. Middle-class children, while not as cosseted by servants, also grew up under close adult oversight and a moral ethos that prized industry. Idleness was frowned upon, so leisure activities had to strike a balance between fun and moral improvement.
By contrast, poor Victorian children often had little time or energy for play at all. In the early Victorian period, before education reforms, many working-class children labored long hours in factories, mines, or as street vendors[4][5]. For them, childhood could be cut brutally short by adult responsibilities. Social reformers and writers like Charles Dickens used such cases as an indictment of contemporary society’s failures – an attack on conditions that robbed children of innocence and play. Dickens’s novels, full of infamous child characters like Oliver Twist working in cruel settings, served to denounce child labor and poverty as social evils. Likewise, journalist Henry Mayhew documented how some destitute children had “entirely lost all childish ways” and knew nothing of toys or parks[6]. Such accounts were a stark indictment of Victorian inequality, highlighting how a childhood without play was a catastrophe for the young. It took decades of reform to improve this situation. Over the Victorian era, laws gradually curtailed child labor (Factory Acts of 1833 and 1844, Mines Act of 1842) and expanded schooling. By 1880, education was made compulsory for children up to age 13, pulling many youth out of the workforce[7][8]. As a result, by the late 19th century more children – even of the lower classes – had indispensable time to play, especially on evenings, Sundays, and school recess breaks. The concept of childhood as a protected time of benign play and learning gained ground. Society began to reconcile the idea that children could be both diligent and playful: that some freedom to romp and imagine was not irrelevant to a child’s development, but rather essential for physical health and moral growth.
Yet even as attitudes shifted, Victorian adults maintained a strong guiding hand over children’s pastimes. Many saw play as an opportunity to instill values. Victorian moralists believed that play should never lead children into mischief or moral peril. As such, “appropriate” games and books were encouraged, while questionable forms of amusement were censured. This ethos meant that the line between education and entertainment often blurred. Toys and games frequently carried gentle lessons or moral symbolism disguised within them. The challenge for Victorian parents and educators was to foresee how a pastime might influence a child’s character – would it encourage good habits or lead to idle frivolity? In this climate, even leisure had to serve a purpose, whether cultivating social skills, creativity, or virtue. With this context in mind, we can explore the popular pastimes that occupied Victorian children’s lives, from the city streets to the parlor rooms, and see how each provided not just fun but also a window into the values of the age.
Outdoor Games and Physical Play
Under the broad sky and often in the streets, Victorian children made a playground of their world. Outdoor games requiring little to no equipment were especially prevalent among all classes – a testament to children’s imaginative ability to create fun from almost nothing. In an era when shop-bought toys were costly luxuries, youngsters of modest means relied on their wits and energy to invent games. A simple hoop and a stick, for example, could provide hours of entertainment. In the classic game of Hoop and Stick, a child would set a wooden hoop rolling along the ground and run alongside, using a stick to keep it spinning as long as possible[9][10]. This pastime might seem negligible in its simplicity, but it demanded balance, speed, and focus. Children often held informal contests to see who could roll a hoop the farthest distance, turning a solitary toy into a social competition[11]. The sight of youngsters chasing hoops down a lane was a common one, cutting across class lines – a well-dressed girl in a country garden or a ragged boy in an alleyway could equally partake. The game’s appeal was universal and instantaneous: with just an old barrel hoop or a makeshift ring, play could begin immediately, no elaborate setup required.
Another noteworthy Victorian favorite was jumping rope, known then as skipping rope. This activity remains familiar today: children would skip over a swinging rope, often to the rhythm of songs or counting rhymes[12]. In Victorian times it was more popular with girls than boys[13], though anyone could join. Groups of girls skipping rope together might incorporate chanting verses, making the game musical and repetitive in a delightful way. With practice and diligence, skilled jumpers introduced ever more challenging variations – faster turns of the rope, hopping on one foot, or instantaneous switches in direction. The repetitive beat of a skipping rhyme echoing down a street was a hallmark of childhood in that era, much as it is now. Because a rope was easily obtainable (even a length of clothesline would do), skipping was accessible to rich and poor alike. Wealthier families might purchase a jump rope with carved wooden handles for a child, but poorer children simply tied a piece of rope or old fabric and still enjoyed the same fun[14]. This democratic nature of outdoor play – requiring minimal gear and a lot of imagination – meant that even youngsters who were otherwise separated by class could momentarily share in the joy of a common game.
Victorian children also loved marbles, a pastime that combined skill, luck, and minor wagers of pride. Boys in particular gathered on sidewalks or parlor floors to shoot small balls and compete for each other’s marbles as prizes[15][16]. Marbles came in many forms: the wealthy might own marbles of real polished stone or fine glass, while poorer kids used cheap clay or even smooth pebbles[17]. Despite these differences, the essential experience was the same – crouching in the dirt or on a chalk-drawn circle, knuckling down to flick one marble against another with precise aim. A good shot could win a child a handful of a friend’s marbles, and with it a moment of triumph. Such games taught lessons in strategy and fair play. Children had to reconcile competitiveness with good sportsmanship, learning not to gloat too much when winning or sulk when losing. In marbles, as in many Victorian games, one can see how play encouraged both individual skill and social rules.
Many outdoor amusements had been passed down through generations, so Victorian youngsters were inheriting folk games from earlier times. Blind Man’s Bluff, Tag, Hide-and-Seek, Kick the Can – these chasing and hiding games needed only people and perhaps open space. Children played them in village greens, cobbled streets, or schoolyards with equal gusto. In Blind Man’s Bluff, for instance, one blindfolded child gropes around to catch others; its popularity endured even in well-furnished Victorian parlors as a party game. Such traditional games provided laughter and exercise, and they cost nothing. If any equipment was needed, it was readily improvised. A ball for catch or cricket could be made by stuffing a rag or sock, as many poorer children did[18][19]. A makeshift bat might be a piece of wood. Victorian youngsters showed imaginative resourcefulness in repurposing everyday items for play – a trend born of necessity that nonetheless spurred creativity.
As the 19th century progressed, some new organized games and sports also filtered into children’s lives. The rules of football (soccer) were codified in England in the 1860s, and soon schoolboys were kicking leather balls around wherever space permitted[20]. The modern concept of team sports in schools emerged in late Victorian Britain, introducing not just fun but also discipline and teamwork into recreation. Boys at elite boarding schools played cricket and rugby; even working-class children in cities began playing street football. These sports reflected an optimistic Victorian belief in muscular fitness and character-building through games. They were seen as training grounds for virtues like fairness, courage, and cooperation. In fact, play in general was increasingly viewed as indispensable for healthy development – a stark change from earlier in the century, when children had been expected to act like miniature adults as soon as possible. By giving children space to run, shout, and compete in a benign environment, Victorian society was slowly coming to appreciate childhood as a unique stage of life with its own irrelevant-to-adults but vital rituals.
Not all outdoor pastimes were purely physical; some engaged the mind or senses as well. A popular Victorian outdoor toy was the whipping top (or whip and top). A child would wrap a string around a wooden spinning top, give it a pull to set it spinning, and then whip the top with the string or a little stick to keep it rotating[21]. Painted tops made colorful blurs when spun, creating a visual delight. Mastering the whip and top involved experimentation and intuition – children learned exactly how hard to tug and when to flick the whip to maintain the spin. Similarly, the Diabolo (a spool spun and tossed on a string tied to two sticks) was a challenging toy that rewarded diligence in practice[22]. Victorian boys and girls would spend hours refining their Diabolo tricks or yo-yo skills, engaging in a form of play that was half art, half sport. Each attempt to catch the spinning spool or perform a yo-yo loop was an exercise in patience and persistence, as well as fun. Through these games, Victorian children built hand-eye coordination and resilience, learning through trial and error in an era that valued self-improvement. Play, in this sense, became a disguise for self-education – children were enlightened about physics and perseverance without even realizing it.
Indoor Amusements and Toys
When Victorian children came indoors – whether due to nightfall, cold weather, or the propriety of the drawing room – their play did not cease. It merely took on different forms, often quieter or more structured than the outdoor romps. Well-to-do families filled nurseries with toys and pastimes meant to amuse as well as edify. A stroll through a Victorian nursery might reveal an array of toys both imaginative and instructive. There would likely be a beloved doll or two for the girls, perhaps a handsome porcelain doll with delicate features and an entire wardrobe of miniature clothes. Dolls allowed girls to imitate adult women’s roles: they would host pretend tea parties with a doll’s tea set, or rock their dolls as if putting babies to sleep. Far from being a trivial diversion, such play was thought to prepare girls for their future roles as mothers and hostesses. Boys of the affluent classes might have sets of toy soldiers – regiments of tin or lead figurines that could be marched across the nursery floor in epic battles[23]. These toys reflected the military and imperial spirit of the age. Through make-believe wars, boys engaged in experimentation with strategy and heroism, often reenacting stories of Britain’s past glories or colonial adventures. Some parents encouraged this, seeing it as harmless patriotism; others, however, worried about overexcitement or aggressive tendencies. Yet even the moral hand-wringers could not fully suppress children’s instinct for dramatic play. Toy soldiers, forts, and battles remained prevalent fixtures of Victorian boyhood imagination.
Among both boys and girls, board games and puzzles provided cozy indoor entertainment, especially on dark winter evenings. Many modern board games trace their popularity to this era. For example, Snakes and Ladders (originally an ancient Indian game) was adapted in Victorian England as a morality-themed board game: players ascend ladders when landing on virtues like Honesty or Industry, but slide down snakes when landing on vices like Greed or Idleness. In this way the game was a fun competition disguised as a moral lesson – winning required luck and perhaps a virtuous life! Likewise, Ludo (based on an Indian game called Pachisi) and draughts (checkers) were common parlor games for children[24]. These games taught counting, strategy, and patience. The whole family might join in, turning an evening into quality time around the game board. There were also myriad puzzle games and pastimes marketed to Victorian families. The 15-puzzle (sliding tile puzzle) became a craze in the 1880s, challenging children’s minds with its logic. Jigsaw puzzles, often depicting maps or historical scenes, were both educational and entertaining. One popular indoor activity was the thaumatrope – a simple optical toy consisting of a disc with two images that appear to merge when spun (for example, a bird on one side and a cage on the other would look like the bird is in the cage when the disc twirls)[25]. This toy delighted children with a touch of mystical illusion and even introduced them to basic principles of animation. It is noteworthy that the Victorian era’s fascination with invention and science trickled down to children’s playthings in this manner.
Victorian families also enjoyed parlor games together, blurring the line between children’s and adults’ entertainment. In an age before television, families created their own fun. Charades, for example, was a hugely popular parlor game in which players acted out words or phrases without speaking, while others guessed – a game still played today. Theatrics and creativity were on display as even children took turns to disguise themselves in silly impromptu costumes or exaggerated pantomime gestures to get the message across. Blind Man’s Bluff, mentioned earlier, often moved indoors as well, with furniture pushed back to make space. The laughter and squeals of this game (blindfolded “It” chasing others) were said to enliven many a Victorian Christmas gathering. Card games like Old Maid or Snap were simple enough for young players and taught quick recognition and a bit of risk-taking in a benign format. Storytelling games, memory games, and spelling bees might also be organized as amusements. These group pastimes were not only fun but also socially instructive: children learned to take turns, follow rules, perform in front of others, and accept victory or defeat graciously – all qualities valued in polite society.
The availability of toys in Victorian times strongly depended on a family’s means. As noted, toys were often expensive luxuries. A lavish item like a rocking horse or a beautifully crafted dollhouse furnished with tiny tables and beds could cost more than an average worker’s weekly wage[26]. Only affluent parents could spoil their children with such gifts, making them special treasures. One can imagine a little girl’s optimistic eyes lighting up at a new dollhouse, where she could arrange the furniture with diligence and play out imaginary domestic stories room by room. Meanwhile, children from poor families had to be imaginative with what little they had. A cheap wooden spinning top, a homemade cloth doll, or a few tin buttons to use as counters might be their only toys[27]. Some crafted their own toys: a scrap of firewood could be carved into a doll, or leftover cloth could become a toy ball. Experimentation with materials was part of the fun – a boy might fashion a kite from newspaper and sticks, discovering through intuition which design would actually fly. A girl might braid wildflowers into dolls’ garlands. These humble playthings were cherished dearly. Because a poor child might only ever own one doll or one ball, he or she would guard it carefully and treat it with great respect[18]. The sheer scarcity of toys made any play opportunity precious. The difference in playthings between rich and poor was no negligible matter, yet the human capacity for play was universal. Children of all backgrounds found ways to be children – laughing, pretending, and creating little worlds of their own – even amid hardships.
Imaginative Play and the World of Literature
Perhaps the most indispensable tool for Victorian children’s play was not a physical object at all, but the imagination. Imaginative play allowed children to transcend the often strict boundaries of Victorian life and explore mystical lands, heroic adventures, and fanciful scenarios in the safety of their minds. Much of this imaginative play was fueled by the era’s rich literature and storytelling traditions. The Victorian period coincided with what is often called the “Golden Age” of children’s literature. As literacy spread and the notion of childhood as a special time took hold, authors began writing stories and novels specifically to entertain young readers – not just to preach morals to them. By mid-century, fairy tales and fantastical stories, once deemed questionable or frivolous by strict moralists, were gaining acceptance. Optimistic narratives that celebrated curiosity and wonder became ever more popular.
One landmark in this shift was Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865) by Lewis Carroll. This story, with its talking rabbits and mad tea parties, presented a world of pure nonsense and fantasy that nonetheless captivated Victorian children and adults alike. Alice’s dreamlike journey did not lay out clear moral lessons; rather, it celebrated the absurd and imaginative for its own sake. The book appeared just as compulsory schooling was expanding, at a time when children were drilled on facts and expected to be obedient. Carroll’s whimsical tale gently subverted that ethos – Alice tries to recite her school lessons in Wonderland, only to find them all coming out wrong, an enigma she cannot solve. Victorian readers found this both amusing and thought-provoking, and it signaled a new appreciation for playfulness. No longer was every story expected to enlighten with a clear sermon; some could simply delight and stir the creative intuition of the child. Still, older habits died hard: many Victorian children’s stories before and even after Alice carried moral or religious overtones. Yet the enormous popularity of fantasy and adventure tales showed that children hungered for mystical and exciting narratives, and that society was slowly indulging this hunger.
Beyond books, children also engaged in imaginative play by staging their own little dramas. A popular middle-class toy was the toy theatre – kits with paper characters and backdrops that allowed children to act out scenes. Children would perform plays (often adaptions of famous stories or historical events) for family and friends, complete with costumes made from old clothes. This was creative play of a high order: kids became playwrights, directors, and actors in one. Such activities fostered storytelling skills and confidence. They also allowed a form of escapism. A child could be a knight, a princess, or an explorer in play, even if in real life they were a schoolboy dreading an exam or a girl constrained by ladylike manners. Imaginative play provided a benign outlet for emotions and aspirations that might be irrelevant or suppressed in formal Victorian daily life.
Reading itself was a major pastime for many Victorian children, especially as literacy rates climbed in the late 19th century. Children from literature-loving families devoured classics like Robinson Crusoe, Gulliver’s Travels, and Pilgrim’s Progress, as well as newer works written for them. Magazines and periodicals aimed at youth also flourished. For example, The Boy’s Own Paper and The Girl’s Own Paper, launched in the 1870s and 1880s, provided stories, puzzles, and advice – a mix of entertainment and instruction. Meanwhile, working-class youth, who might find Dickens’s novels too expensive or slow-paced, turned to cheap penny dreadfuls for thrills. Penny dreadfuls were serialized adventure and horror stories printed on flimsy paper, sold for a penny each. They often featured sensational characters like vampires, pirates, or detective heroes, in tales full of crime and danger[28][29]. Young readers found them irresistible. Teens and even younger kids would pool their pennies to buy the latest installment of a favorite story and pass it around. Reading these tales (or listening to them read aloud in a group) became a communal pastime[30][31]. Importantly, the fad for penny dreadfuls actually boosted literacy among the poor – kids were motivated to learn to read so they could follow the exploits of characters like Sweeney Todd or Jack Harkaway[32]. This phenomenon, however, alarmed many adults. Moralists considered penny dreadfuls infamous for their blood-and-thunder content and feared these pulpy stories would corrupt young minds. Critics denounced the tales as dangerously optimistic about crime or at least as glorifying violence, and they lamented the experimentation with dark themes. One commentator in 1861 described penny dreadfuls as a lurid world of “murderous baronets… and lunatics and ghosts”[33], clearly finding such fare questionable for youth. Some even painted these cheap novels as a moral catastrophe, blaming them for juvenile delinquency. Despite such outcry, the penny dreadfuls continued to flourish through the end of the century, illustrating a recurring pattern in the history of play: whatever the medium – be it street games or sensational stories – children’s preferred amusements often drew adult anxiety, yet undeniably served the children’s own needs for excitement and escape.
Values and Morality in Children’s Play
Victorian pastimes for children were not just benign fun; they often carried deeper significance in terms of socialization and values. Play was one arena where Victorian ideals and anxieties played out on a small scale. For one, Victorian play frequently mirrored the virtues that adults wanted to instill. The prevalence of team sports and organized games, for example, reflected society’s emphasis on diligence, fair play, and cooperation. A game of cricket or football was not just exercise; it was training in teamwork and gentlemanly conduct. Children were expected to abide by rules, show sportsmanship, and respect authority – the captain of the team or the umpire, for instance – which paralleled the respect due to teachers and parents. Even informal playground games often had implicit codes of conduct, teaching kids to negotiate rules and settle disputes. These social skills were seen as indispensable preparation for adult life in a highly structured society.
Moreover, many Victorian amusements contained moral metaphors or lessons. We saw how Snakes and Ladders was essentially a morality tale on a board. Likewise, the stories read by children – whether moral tales or adventure novels – commonly contrasted virtues and vices, rewarding the good and punishing the wicked in the end. This was optimistic literature in the sense that it assured young readers that behaving righteously leads to good outcomes. Even fairy tales were often retold with a moralizing bent during the Victorian period (for instance, versions of Little Red Riding Hood were altered to stress the consequences of disobedience). Thus, leisure time was suffused with gentle moral education. Parents encouraged toys like puzzles, construction sets, or science experiments that cultivated the mind, seeing play as an opportunity to enlighten the child in an enjoyable way. An example of this was the popularity of natural history hobbies: many Victorian youngsters took up collecting butterflies, pressing flowers, or assembling stamp collections. Such hobbies were not only fun but also educational, introducing children to scientific ideas and the wider world. Stamp collecting, dubbed the “electric science” of the youth, became known as the “king of hobbies” soon after the introduction of postage stamps in 1840[34]. A child poring over a stamp album was learning geography, history, and patience all at once. The diligence required to organize a collection or classify specimens was considered character-building. In this way, play and study intertwined.
However, the Victorian approach to play also had its contradictions and critics. Some observers noted that the constant moralizing and supervision of children’s activities could stifle creativity. The most imaginative forms of play often occurred when adults were not directing every move – for instance, children making up fantastical stories in the nursery or inventing nonsense rhymes in the schoolyard. Such intuition-driven, creative play was sometimes dismissed by strict educators as idle fancy. But by the end of the 19th century, a few progressive thinkers began to argue that play in itself had value for a child’s development. Pioneering educators like Friedrich Froebel, the inventor of kindergarten (whose ideas spread to Britain), emphasized free play as central to learning. They believed children’s experimentation with blocks, songs, and games could teach abstract concepts and social skills better than rote memorization. This was a radical notion in a society used to formal discipline. It suggests that even within the Victorian era’s seemingly partisan stance favoring order and propriety, there were the seeds of a more modern understanding of child’s play.
One cannot discuss Victorian childhood without acknowledging the repetitive harsh refrain that not all children got to experience these joys. For the poorest and most unfortunate, play remained a luxury. Yet, the visibility of hardship ironically bolstered society’s resolve to treat children better. By comparing the lively, playful child with the grim child laborer, Victorian reformers made a powerful point: the ability to play freely was a hallmark of a healthy childhood, and its absence was a social indictment. This realization helped drive improvements in child welfare and education. In literature, too, the figure of the joyful, playful child – think of characters like Paul Dombey playing with his toys in Dickens’s Dombey and Son, or the cheeky schoolboys in Thomas Hughes’s Tom Brown’s School Days – became emblematic of innocence and hope. Such portrayals stood in stark contrast to earlier centuries where children were seen as inherently wayward or ignorant mini-adults. By the late Victorian era, the pendulum had swung: a child at play was celebrated as a symbol of innocence, the very opposite of corruption. Play had been, in effect, reconciled with virtue.
Finally, Victorian society also used play as a means of unity and national pride. Mass public entertainments and holidays often included children’s games. For instance, on Queen Victoria’s Golden Jubilee in 1887, street parties were held where children played games and were given treats – a way to include them in national celebrations. There was an understanding that happy, well-rounded children would grow into moral and productive citizens of the empire. In that sense, every well-spent childhood hour, whether devoted to a book, a game of hopscotch, or a spell of daydreaming, was an investment in the future. The Victorians’ optimistic faith in progress and character found expression in even the simplest of childhood pastimes.
Conclusion
The popular pastimes of Victorian children reveal a vibrant tapestry of play that is at once familiar and far-removed from our own time. We recognize in their skipping rope songs and games of tag the timeless spirit of childhood. We marvel at their homemade toys and creative autonomy, seeing how necessity and invention went hand in hand. From outdoor frolics with hoops and marbles to indoor diversions with dolls, puzzles, and storybooks, Victorian children found joy in countless (indeed, myriad) activities that required little more than a lively mind and maybe a few simple props. These pastimes were more than just idle fun; they were a microcosm of Victorian values and societal change. Play taught lessons of cooperation, endurance, and morality, all under the guise of amusement. It provided an escape from the strictures of a hierarchically ordered world, allowing children to be explorers, heroes, and dreamers in their own realms. Even as stern-faced adults worried and denounced some of the new fads or questionable pleasures, children continued to play with optimistic enthusiasm. In the end, the legacy of Victorian children’s pastimes is enduring. Many of their games and stories remain with us today, a testimony to how that era managed to balance work and play, instructive and imaginative, duty and delight. Victorian children, living in an age of steam engines and social reform, may have appeared proper and contained on the surface, but in their play we find a universe of wonder – one where a simple spinning top or a story about a Wonderland could unlock laughter, learning, and the innocent mysteries of youth[6][32].
[1] [2] [3] [4] [8] Victorian Children: Life in the 1800s - Where Minds Meet Myths
https://www.cognimyths.com/victorian-children
[5] [6] Alice and the Question of Victorian Childhood - Archives & Special Collections Library - Vassar College
[7] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] How Gruesome Penny Dreadfuls Got Victorian Children Reading - Atlas Obscura
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/penny-dreadfuls-victorian-children-literacy
[9] [10] [11] [12] [15] [16] [17] [20] [21] [22] Victorian Playground Games for Children | Designs & Lines
https://designsandlines.co.uk/blog/the-best-victorian-playground-games-for-children/
[13] [14] [18] [23] [26] [27] Victorian Toys and Victorian Games - Victorian Children
https://victorianchildren.org/victorian-toys-and-victorian-games/
https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/history/handsonhistory/victorians_games.pdf
[34] Stamp Collecting—The King of Hobbies
https://blog.library.si.edu/blog/2011/01/29/stamp-collectingthe-king-of-hobbies/